Which of the following is NOT one of the criteria established in the Castaneda vs. Pickard case?

In the context of the Castaneda vs. Pickard case, the established criteria focus on ensuring that educational strategies for English language learners are grounded in sound theory, are implemented effectively with sufficient resources, and demonstrate effectiveness in practice. These criteria emphasize the need for instructional methods that are not only theoretically sound but also practically viable and capable of achieving positive outcomes for students.

The criterion related to complete immersion in English does not align with the established criteria from the case. While immersion can be a method of teaching English, it is not a requirement outlined in the decision. Instead, the focus was on ensuring that various instructional methods are assessed for their educational soundness and effectiveness without mandating one specific method, such as complete immersion. This reflects an understanding that diverse approaches can be tailored to meet the needs of different English language learners, rather than a one-size-fits-all solution.